A.
Our inspectors are investigating.
Apparently the developer to renovate the building located at 29 rue de Rome wanting to transform a single family home in house reports did not even bother to wait for the opinion of the Commission for Coordination to start work - heavy. If so, it's a scandal! The town Saint-Gilles and the Royal Commission for Monuments and Sites to ensure grain and stopped dead site.
B. Our inspectors investigated.
The planning department tells us that this is not a listed building but in a mansion. People have actually started work without obtaining a permit. Consultative Commission of December 14 was postponed his notice until a site visit. During this visit to what was already a building site, the decision to halt the current work was taken. The opinion of the town was finally unfavorable to the project.
The case is currently under investigation: it will be sent to the Brussels Region. It will have 45 days to give its opinion. Then, this notice will be sent to college in that it will take 15 days to render a final opinion.
In summary, for a final opinion, it will have to wait about 2 months. It is always possible that the applicant changed his plan at all these procedures - or even withdraw his project.
Anyway, if the opinion is negative in the end: we can assume that there will be a minimum fine and the worst (so to speak) the owner shall rebuild the demolished portions in the state where they were before the license application.
C.
was worded Here's how the permit application submitted at the public inquiry of 10/11/10 to 24/11/10.
Applicant: Mr & Mrs Despoelberch - Vilariça
The request is for changing the number and distribution of housing volume changes, change of use and installation of parking.
Existing situation: Single Family
Projected situation: 1appartements + 3 1 bedroom apartments 2 rooms + 1 apartment 3 bedrooms.
Transforming an apartment building into apartments with extension at the ground and first floor and creation of terraces at the rear. Creation of dormers to front and rear of the building to street. Transform the store / depot abandoned in the back (rebate) into 2 apartments with no change in volume. Demolition of the entire roof between two buildings and landscaping, terraces and a pergola for 3 parking spaces created.
D.
The opinion of the Commission's Consultation 14/12/10:
Whereas during the public inquiry which ran from 10/11/2010 to 24/11/2010
, the next mail came on behalf of the Mayor and Aldermen:
Guy Sohy Rue de Rome, 31 1060 Brussels
Winnepenninckx Mr. Rue de Rome, 27 1060 Brussels
Mr. Meulemans Rue de Rome, 27 1060 Brussels
Bruiz Mr. Rue de Rome, 27 1060 Brussels
STATEMENT FILE
Located: SAPP: residential
in area of cultural, historic, aesthetic or beautification
border in core business in
variation point of mixed
along a space structuring
PPAS: None.
RCU: none
Protection Area: Perimeter Protection: "Old House Hoguet" street
Rome, 24-28. 29/10/1998 AG.
EXCEPTIONS:
Notwithstanding s. .4 of Title 1 of RRU (depth of construction)
Notwithstanding s. .6 of Title 1 of RRU (roof - high)
Notwithstanding article 13 of Title 1 of RRU (maintenance of a permeable surface)
derogation to Article 10 of Title 2 of RRU (net area illuminating)
derogation to Article 3 of Title 2 of RRU (minimum area - area of habitable space
)
Submitted to the opinion of the Consultation Committee and special measures for advertising
:
derogation the art of Title 1 of .4 RRU (depth of construction)
Notwithstanding article 13 of Title 1 of the RRU (maintenance of a permeable surface)
Notwithstanding s. .6 of Title 1 of RRU (roof - high)
application of the special requirement 2.5.2 ° SAPP (changes in urban characteristics
constructions)
application general requirement of 0.6. SAPP (acts and proceedings affecting
interiors of islets)
application of art. 153, CoBAT (exemption planning regulations)
application of art. 237, COBAT (protection zone of a well classified (actions and works
changing perspectives on the property or accommodation from the latter))
Considering that the property is situated in residential area of the Regional Plan allocation of land
arrested by Government Decree of 3 May 2001, and in the scope of protection of classified property
located 24-28 rue de Rome
Considering that the property is listed in the inventory of architectural heritage (building
before 1932);
Considering that the request is to amend the number of units (division
single-family homes at the front in 3 places) The volume change
(extensions and dormers to the front building, pergola and terraces within islet
the rear building), the alternative use of the rear building (remodeling
2 units) and the creation of 3 locations Indoor parking island;
Considering that during the investigation Public held from 10/11/2010 to 24/11/2010
, 4 complaints were filed and include: •
creating indoor parking island (noise and smell
, Impact of the pergola)
terraces • 1st and 2nd floors of the building before (negative views)
Considering the unfavorable opinion of the CRMS: interventions with domestic
as a consequence of altering profoundly the mansion ( mezzanine in between
cochere particular), sites Parking not satisfying for
housing;
The Committee therefore issued a DEFERRAL NOTICE pending a site visit.
The owners did not actually wait for the final opinion of the town and the region or even the visiting officials. Let alone the licensing - the process is underway.
0 comments:
Post a Comment