The press has rallied in early 2011 to discuss the project again from the town to build an underground parking place-Marie Janson.
So far, the case referred to a number of tracks: 150 to 450 places could be created. It is finally the car park for 200 cars that the study's authors propose to build. But nothing says that we do not'll talk soon maximalist version!
Yesterday, Tuesday, January 11, 2011, both in radio and in print, local authorities have reiterated their determination mad.
there's new then? Not really: nothing has changed fundamentally since December 22, 2010: since then, the only certainty is that the demand for repeal of PPAS about this "green space" has received a favorable opinion of the Commission so consultation. It therefore remained to obtain authorization to pursue this project further. This has been acquired yesterday. The Economic and Social Committee and the Regional Mobility and also issued a positive opinion.
Why then return to this subject and now what? Probably
a way to tap the nail and do "as if" this car park would be built anyway, despite the opposition of a very large proportion of residents and merchants.
is a detestable procedure that once again highlights the inability of the town to communicate with its population fair and transparent!
So far, the case referred to a number of tracks: 150 to 450 places could be created. It is finally the car park for 200 cars that the study's authors propose to build. But nothing says that we do not'll talk soon maximalist version!
Yesterday, Tuesday, January 11, 2011, both in radio and in print, local authorities have reiterated their determination mad.
there's new then? Not really: nothing has changed fundamentally since December 22, 2010: since then, the only certainty is that the demand for repeal of PPAS about this "green space" has received a favorable opinion of the Commission so consultation. It therefore remained to obtain authorization to pursue this project further. This has been acquired yesterday. The Economic and Social Committee and the Regional Mobility and also issued a positive opinion.
Why then return to this subject and now what? Probably
a way to tap the nail and do "as if" this car park would be built anyway, despite the opposition of a very large proportion of residents and merchants.
is a detestable procedure that once again highlights the inability of the town to communicate with its population fair and transparent!
0 comments:
Post a Comment